10.0 Workplace Transition Plan
10.1 Introduction
‘School to work’ transition is challenging for almost every young person. It is in this critical education transition period that a young person’s future can be determined, and the success (or otherwise) of the transition can have implications that last a lifetime. This is particularly true for young people with disability.
10.1 School to work transition
School to work’ transition refers to the critical socio-economic life changing period between approximately 15 to 24 years of age – a period when young individuals develop and build skills, based on their initial education and training that helps them become productive members of the society (World Bank, 2009). School to work transition is basing on the following assumptions:
- Preparing for transition to employment and adulthood is essential for all students; for students with diverse needs, the additional barriers to employment and other adult activities must be considered in the planning process.
- Career/life transition planning can be integrated into existing individual planning activities.
- Students’ needs and interests should be the primary determinants in selecting the goals for the future that will guide the career/life transi tion process.
- Career/life transition planning should enhance student empowerment and self-determination.
- Students and, if relevant, their parents or guardians should be helped to become effective self-advocates and knowledgeable users of services.
- Successful career/life transition planning requires communication and co-operation among parents, students, educators, adult service providers, social workers, and natural supports within the community.
- The most important of all the career/life transitional goals may be developing social relationships.
- When students set employment as a transition goal, this goal should, whenever possible, be paid, competitive employment.
10.2 The impact of transition from school to work
The focus will be how schools prepare individuals with disabilities for their life in the family and workplaces. Family has its role in this chapter we are looking at how the school as a school has shaped an individual with disability to meet the family and workplaces roles. This is justified in the reality that school is a place where individuals get new skills in addressing challenges.
The strategies for a good transition from school back to family is explored and discussed. Workplace issues are also addressed as it is known that workplaces are places where individuals with disability develop their economic and purchasing power and engage themselves as individuals and participants in the society development activities.
The impact of young people with disability making a successful transition from school to work and/or further study is critical as a positive one can greatly improve their long-term economic future, wellbeing and inclusion in society.
Those who do not make a successful transition are at greater risk of labour force and social exclusion, as well physical and mental health risks. Hence targeted and strategic policy and program intervention during transition provides benefit to the individual as well as our wider society and economy.
Indeed, transition points in life, or the ‘fork in the road’ periods, are important times in an individual’s life when timely resources and support investment in can assist in avoiding or minimising long-term disadvantage.
During the transition from school period young people often encounter great uncertainties and tremendous developmental challenges. These issues may be made more stressful by the presence of a disability, thereby increasing the risk of social exclusion amongst those young people who are transitioning and have a disability.
Young people with disability are not successfully transitioning from school into further training or employment; a factor that is an indicator of long term, and often life-long, disadvantage. Young people with disability are more likely to drop out of school early, be excluded from the labour force, have fewer educational qualifications, experience poverty and be socially isolated point of contact.
Improving these outcomes is a societal imperative as well as an economic one. Societal has obligation that enables all people to participate fully in society and be active citizens. Economic, because increasing the number of persons with disability in employment can contribute to mitigating some of the labour force effects imposed by an ageing population, can reduce pension dependency and improve individuals’ overall financial and wellbeing status.
Research has identified the following as the three proponents of a good quality of life for a person with disability (regardless of the disability type): being engaged in employment, on-going learning and/or training; living in and participating in your local community in a way similar to same age peers; and, having active social networks with family and friends. A ‘good transition’ from school and into a successful post-school life can assist in achieving the aforementioned quality of life elements.
As noted above, it has been found that five key elements comprise a ‘good transition’; these being ‘career development and workplace preparation’, ‘work experience’, vocational training’ ‘School-based Apprenticeship and Traineeship’ and ‘part-time work’. These options are available to non-disabled persons.
Career development and workplace preparation
Every young person needs the opportunity to transition successfully from school to ongoing learning, work and community life. To do this successfully, young people and particularly those with disability, need information, support and guidance from an array of people that may directly or indirectly influence their career development and
pathways planning. A a lack of access to suitable user-friendly information about training options and poor career guidance for those with a disability make it difficult for them to make informed choices about VET and apprenticeships during periods of transition (e.g. beginning senior secondary school, when leaving school).
“Young people with disability face the same barriers and challenges as all young people entering the workforce. Many of these can be exacerbated by their disability and they may also face a number of additional barriers, such as negative misconceptions about their ability, a lack of easily accessible information, and limited workplace experience. In some areas of the education and transition system there is still a prevailing culture that these actors ‘know best’ and are best placed to determine post-school options for young people with disability.
In maintaining this approach, young people are missing out on moderating and engaging in self-determination when it comes to career development and workplace exploration. Making the initial transition from secondary schooling into further education and training or work can be particularly difficult and challenging for young people with disability who often have not had access to services and experiences designed to facilitate their career development.
For students with additional educational needs planning for post-school life should begin at around 14 years of age as early planning allows students to familiarise themselves with the post-school environment, set goals for the future, learn the skills that will assist towards meeting those goals, and make adjustments if goals or desires change. It’s a self-determined process where students, supported by their parents and family make choices about what they wish to do and achieve when they leave school.
Put simply, experience must precede choice, something often not made available to young people with disability preparing to transition from school and into a life beyond school. In these instances, the young people have not had opportunity to experience authentic employment or career development activities to ensure they make informed decisions about their post-school pathways.
To achieve these quality outcomes and career development, five key areas of transition practice were identified by Paula Kohler and her colleagues, with their model known as ‘Kohler’s Taxonomy for Transition Programming’ (1996).
This taxonomy is based on effective practices that have the goal of improving post- school outcomes and transition for students with disabilities. The categories and practices (which were identified through literature reviews, evaluations, meta-evaluation and concept mapping) are:
- Student-Focused Planning practices that use assessment information, student self-determination, and student postsecondary goals to develop Individual Plans
- Student Development practices that emphasize life, employment, and occupational skill development via school-based and work-based learning in addition to student assessments and accommodations
- Interagency Collaboration practices that facilitate involvement of community businesses, organisations, and agencies in transition education including interagency agreements that articulate roles, responsibilities, communications, and other strategies to foster collaboration and enhance curriculum and program development
- Program Structure practices that relate to efficient and effective delivery of transition-focused education and services including philosophy, planning, policy, evaluation, human resource development, and the structures and attributes of schools
- Family Involvement practices that increase the ability of family members to work effectively with educators and service providers in planning and delivering education and transition services.
Kohler is clear that transitional focused curriculum and education experiences should: begin at age 14, Not be in addition to, Nor an adaptation of, and But the fundamental basis of the final years of secondary school (Kohler and Field, 2003).
Research confirms that a curriculum firmly based in teaching these skills in the context of the student’s community is effective in promoting positive post school outcomes.
Career preparation and work-based learning experiences are essential in order to form and develop aspirations and to make informed choices about careers.
These experiences can be provided during the school day, through after-school programs, through work experience and through collaborations with other services and organisations. It is clear that career development should not and cannot just be the domain of schools.
Work experience
Work experience can play in improving the transition outcomes of student with disability. For decades, research has shown the strong relationship between the experience of work during secondary school and higher post-school employment for youth with disabilities.
Consistently, the most prominent factors is associated with successful postschool employment outcomes are paid and unpaid work experiences during the last years of secondary school and the completion of a high school diploma.
However, as the continuing disappointing postschool employment rates for young people with disabilities suggest, there remains a critical need to expand quality work-based learning opportunities for these young people and to integrate these experiences into secondary education.
Indeed, while work experiences are beneficial to all youth, it has been found they are particularly valuable for young people with disabilities many students with disability are not undertaking work experience during their school years; whereas their non-disability peers are routinely taking part in work experience in Years 9 or 10. It has been said that schools often feel that they are ill-equipped (in terms of knowledge, skills and resources) to arrange and support work experience for students with disability.
Employers are reluctant to interview young people without relevant experience, but there are few available opportunities for young people to acquire it, particularly if a young person has a disability.
Vocational Education and Training
VET are strong vocational pathways with good employment outcomes for young people with disability, particularly VET which includes some form of work-based training such as apprenticeships and traineeships.
It has been found that students with a disability enrolled in an apprenticeship or traineeship have better employment outcomes, when compared against other types of VET courses.
This may be because of the employment or on-the-job relationship embedded in the apprenticeship and traineeship models. Therefore a student undertaking a School-based Apprenticeships and Traineeship is more likely to have long term employment prospects.
Likewise, training that involves practical experience in the workplace is more likely to lead to employment for young people with a disability.
Many young people with Intellectual disability have not been successful in institutionalised training, and work better through practical, hands-on experience. Wherever possible, Ticket to Work blends formal learning with direct workplace experience and on-the-job training.
Programs to support employment builds on this and many participants are undertaking the majority of their vocational training component on the job, demonstrating competency by actually undertaking tasks in the workplace setting. We have found that this contributes to better employment outcomes for this cohort of young people. Completing a VET qualification not only helps people with a disability to find work, but it also increases their chances of sustaining employment into the future.
School-based Apprenticeships and Traineeship
School-based Apprenticeships and Traineeships (SbATs) allow students over 15 years of age to work as paid part-time apprentices or trainees while still at school. SbATs enable young people to gain a vocational qualification and paid workplace experience while also completing their senior school studies. SbATs prepare students for the world of work and assist employers to attract young employees into their business and industry.
Part-time work at school
Existing research suggests that part-time work can help facilitate the transition from school to work. Studies from have found a clear relationship between part-time employment while at school and a lower incidence of unemployment following completion of school. it is well acknowledged that students who participate in part-time work have higher percentages of post-school employment throughout their lives one would suspect this would be the same for students with disability. A part-time job is a rite of passage that is often not available for young people with significant disability and can deliver vital employability skills and lead to employment post-school.
10.4 Transition from school to work in Europe
Legislation
In most EU countries there are specific measures provided by legislation, for ensuring preparation for and transition to work for youngsters with disabilities, in various ways. One the most widespread – even if sometimes criticised – is the sheltered workshop (Council of Europe, 2003).
Transition services
In most EU countries the transition support is complementary, additional to other services (EADSNE, 2002, 2006) A European study on transition from school to work, undertaken in 2002, in 16 countries, members of EU provide some interesting findings (EADSNE, 2002). The following domains were explored:
- The involvement of pupils in the transition process;
- Transition models;
- Accreditations (qualifications and diplomas);
- The support;
- Networking – external services (to education), relationships, cooperation;
Policies and practical measure
As a result of this study some significant factors in identifying barriers and facilitators for facilitating transition were discovered, in various fields. An excerpt is presented bellow, in connection with one of the most vulnerable area: the needed close work relations between educational and work services.
Barriers:
- Closed systems (the schools and the employing companies are from two different worlds);
- The schooling has a strong influence on the afterschool opportunities – the pupil is trained for only one career track, which is often in a specialised centre.
Facilitators:
- Building networks (at the social and professional level – France);
- Setting up creative measures (Portugal);
- Extending the „double systems” (the theory from the school and the practice from the enterprises);
- Organising flexible training measures (Germany);
- Upgrading communication between sectors (especially between school and work places)
- A data base regarding work employment available (Norway);
- Monitoring the pupils by the schools (Netherlands);
- Support measures (with human, financial, technical, material services – Greece).
Transition planning
A study on Individual Transition Plans (ITP) developed by EADSNE in 2006 was focused on the ITP in 19 EU countries. In these European countries it is already a practice of assisting the adolescents and youngsters with disabilities at the end of the schooling, for the passage from school to work and life. Building the transition support should include the ongoing participation of the young person and his family, the coordination of all responsible services and a close cooperation with employment sector. This complex activity, seen as a bridge between work and school is very well reflected in the Individual Transition Plan (ITP). Definition of ITP – It is a tool, formalised as a document, in which it is condensed the past, the present and the future of a person. ITP should contain life information concerning: family circumstances, medical history, free time, cultural context and values, education and training.
The design and use of an ITP should contribute to the following outcomes:
- To increase the chances of a person to find a sustainable job;
- To match the interests, motivations, skills, attitudes and competences of a young person to the demands of a profession, place and working environments, of a hiring company;
- To increase the autonomy, motivation, self perception and self esteem of the young person;
- To create a ‘win-win’ situation for both parties (the employed person and the employer).
Gaps and solutions
Main Gaps
- Lack of support services for transition. While in the EU countries and USA there is formal and effective support, implemented in various ways, for the transition from school to work at young people with disabilities, in Romania this type of support is missing, both in legislation and in practice.
- Lack of formal and institutional planning for transition. In most European countries and in the USA the planning for transition is seriously taken into consideration. In Romania there is no plan similar with an ITP.
Solutions suggested
- Promoting legislative changes – in order to mention and strengthen specifically the need for support services during the transition period (from school to work) for youngsters with disabilities. There are provisions in the European Legislation (The European Disability Strategy 2010-2020, point 4), which could help the process of change.
- Developing secondary legislation, based on some general provisions from the ones already mentioned above (The Law 448/2006 and The National Education Law no.1/2011) – in order to allow and develop the sheltered workshops inside or in close connection with schools, thus setting up as well the support for transition function of such a workshop.
- Debates should be initiated and research undertaken focussing on the transition services needed (psychological counseling, educational and vocational orientation, employment expert in particular cases – disabilities – etc) in order to define these and make them operational.
- Exploring – via action-research – the ways of designing and implementing the planning of transition at the individual level for all youngsters (age 16-18) with disabilities, at request.